Home/Compare/NAO vs LimX Oli
Head-to-head · Research vs Research

NAO vs LimX Oli

LimX Oli has the stronger public evidence base, with an Arena rating 35 points above NAO. NAO is cheaper ($16,990 vs From CN¥158,000). LimX Oli is 107 cm taller.

Who wins? Cast your vote

people's ranking →

Which one looks better?

NAO, full body
NAO
Aldebaran
58 cm · $16,990 · Purchasable
LimX Oli, full body
LimX Oli
LimX Dynamics
165 cm · From CN¥158,000 · Purchasable
NAOLimX Oli
CompanyAldebaranLimX Dynamics
CountryFranceChina
StatusPurchasablePurchasable
Price$16,990From CN¥158,000
How to get oneBuy nowPre-order
Arena rating9731,008
EvidenceB-C
Height58 cm (1 ft 11 in)165 cm (5 ft 5 in)
Weight5.5 kg (12 lb)55 kg (121 lb)
Payloadn/a3 kg (7 lb)
Runtime1 h1.5 h
Degrees of freedom25 DoF31 DoF
Hand DoFn/a6 DoF
Top speedn/a1.39 m/s (5 km/h)
HandsHands have tactile sensors (capacitive); no separate hand degrees of freedom, force feedback, or grip specifications were found.Multiple end-effector options available; no hand-specific degrees of freedom or force feedback specifications were published.
Announced2006-07-212025-07-31

Capability evidence, side by side

score per dimension, 0-100
Manipulation
34
54
Autonomy
68
34
Mobility
54
54
Perception
34
34
Human interaction
68
34
Reliability
34
34
Human-environment fit
54
34
NAO
LimX Oli

Arena matchup result

overall human like capability
Result
LimX Oli
Low
NAO wins
0%
of validated votes
LimX Oli wins
100%
of validated votes
Insufficient
0%
tracked separately

Current evidence comparison for NAO and LimX Oli.

NAO

Aldebaran
Two Aldebaran NAO humanoid robots, one with blue accents and one with red accents, standing against a white backdrop
Photo: Softbank Robotics Europe, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

NAO V6 is a 58 cm, 5.48 kg, 25-DoF bipedal humanoid sold by RobotLAB for $16,990 and Generation Robots for €10,020 incl VAT. It uses an Intel Atom E3845 with 4 GB RAM, two 5 MP cameras, four microphones, sonar, tactile sensors, and a 62.5 Wh battery rated for 60-90 minutes. About 20,000 units have reportedly been sold in 70 countries; USC has 12 units. It is an education/research platform with Choregraphe, Python, and C++. Autonomy is claimed but not independently benchmarked; video demos exist but were title-only in this review. No payload, walking speed, hand DoF, or manipulation demos were found

LimX Oli

LimX Dynamics
LimX Oli humanoid robot posed dynamically in a promotional graphic.
Image: © LimX Dynamics · official website

LimX Oli is a pre-order, 165 cm, 55 kg, 31-DoF biped research humanoid from LimX Dynamics, priced from RMB 158,000 (~$21,800). It has dual Intel RealSense depth cameras, a 6-axis IMU, modular design and slide-out battery, but no official payload, runtime, battery capacity or walking speed. The strongest public evidence is a secondary research summary reporting stair climbing of a 33-step spiral staircase in 12 seconds with zero falls, and benchmark returns of 0.85 for velocity tracking. Official video titles claim fully autonomous tennis ball picking and scalable autonomous deployment, but no transcripts or independent verification were found. No named customer deployment exists

NAO vs LimX Oli FAQ

answers from sourced data

Which is better, NAO or LimX Oli?

On public evidence, LimX Oli currently rates higher (1,008 vs 973). The better choice still depends on the job: compare availability, price and the capability rows above.

Which is cheaper, NAO or LimX Oli?

NAO: $16,990. LimX Oli: From CN¥158,000. Prices are in the seller's currency and configurations differ.

Which is taller, NAO or LimX Oli?

NAO is 58 cm (1 ft 11 in); LimX Oli is 165 cm (5 ft 5 in).

Can you buy the NAO or the LimX Oli?

NAO: buy now. LimX Oli: pre-order.